Check the types involved in the current matchup, note which team members are disadvantaged, and choose available coverage. Exact multipliers and a full chart were not provided.
- Check both sides of the displayed matchup.
- Consider shared weaknesses across the team.
- Include move type in coverage planning.
- Do not infer numeric multipliers without a source.
The supplied plan highlights matchups and weaknesses but provides no complete numeric chart. This page explains how to use type relationships you can verify in game.
On this page
Read the Matchup Before You Choose
The user-provided outline identifies type matchups as a factor in encounters and warns that an unfavorable matchup can challenge a run. Read the information shown in game and compare it with the current team. No full chart or numeric values were supplied.
- Read the displayed matchup.
- Check shared weaknesses.
- Compare available move and Pokémon types.
Connect Matchups to Team Coverage
A matchup reference matters when it changes a team decision. Note what the current team covers and where it has a gap. One observation can describe that situation, but it does not establish every type interaction.
- Track an observation with its game context.
- Keep unknown relationships marked unknown.
- Look for repeated team weaknesses.
- Add numeric values only with source support.
Use Matchups in a Run
When an encounter appears, review the team first. If several choices share a known weakness, compare available moves and Pokémon for coverage. Reassess after the battle if it exposed a new limitation.
- Identify the current risk.
- Compare available coverage.
- Choose for the current team, not a universal claim.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where is the full chart?
A complete chart and numeric values were not part of the supplied material.
How should I use type matchups?
Compare the current matchup with types and moves available to the team.
What if my team shares a weakness?
Note which members may be affected and consider other coverage choices.
Are multipliers verified?
No numeric multiplier was supplied or independently checked.